1080年至1120年 - 1260至00年 - 1010至40年 - 1240至80年
Yes I got Mine Last week. I love It . Very Very good,and when combined witht the right Areal clover leaf is well turned to go nicly i do like a clean 1-2 k with out any wirless or video glitches in any way . id say do 3-5 kilomters clean with patch pointing can go to long 6-10 k with the 2 wat controler is good. i useing just the needed gear incase i loose out during tests/ tho only,, my bad wireing can let me down,/ this 1.2 will Not let you down, this Is So good.. i had to locate another. and I will Have 2 FPV sets 1 w and 2 w controler ,, i want another UHF 5 w booster. being the Ultimate Long distance Controler Transmitter 433 uhf, yet 1-2w is the Go to suite this well. 5 wat might be evan further but will you realy want to go 30k.1- 5 k seams enough for me. thanks, great pruduct .The best Tx in the world. Using original antennas, I can fly 3km... The image quality is very good. I recommend!didnt tested it yet. heard about some problems with 2.4ghz i will update you about my FrSky 2.4GHz laterBeste Video TX availeble for a great price! Perfect image with long range!Just got my 1.2 TX/RX pair.
Power tested OK at the stated 1 watt.
Their were no instructions with either the RX or TX as to which channel is which. It seems the TX has binary encoded switches which correspond to the 8 channels listed, and the RX has 8 dip switches which select channels 1 to 8.
The video quality is very good with no discernible picture quality difference between the transmitted signal and that from a direct coax connection between the camera and 22 inch monitor when using a 700 line camera (PAL)
I was not able to do a range check, only tested at short range.
The TX needs an additional heat sink as it gets too hot very quickly even at a cool room temperature.
HK please publish a list of channels versus switches for both the TX and RX.