HK-2 RTF 3D-Style Kunstflugzeug EPO

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Apr 07, 2009

Good plane, but not glued good, a lot of gaps. ESC earned only after the installation costs at the maximum of throttle channel.



, , , , .

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Apr 07, 2009

Je le commande ds que les lipo sont dispo.....

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Certified Buyer Rated

Mar 23, 2009

buen vuelo, utilizo motor turnigy 28XX 2200 mah, lo unico malo es el tren de aterrizaje, es un poco debil

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Mar 19, 2009

Equipped with a 2200mAh 20C battery (190gr.) the CG is Ok and the total weight is 1.130gr. The absortion with the std 13X4 prop is 28 Amp and it flies well even it can't climb up vertically. I prefer using a 12X6 propeller (the absortion is 27 Amp) because it flies better at some speed. The landing gear can easily be damaged in non soft landings (some speed and throttle can help).

A honest sport-aerobatic plane for a very good price.

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Mar 11, 2009

Very good plane, beautiful, and the price.......best off



thanks HK

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Mar 11, 2009

super avion.mont en 20 minute a peine.tout est fournie helice moteur controleur servos.

le train d'atterissage ma l'air un peu souple mais on verra.par contre attention si vous prenez la livraison en 3 jours car il y a des frais de douane obligatoire de 56 pour la france.mais il en vaut le coup

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Mar 03, 2009

very nice airplane good fly fast shippin.i use zippy 2100 30-40c and i fly 12min.the alevator need small movement

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Mar 03, 2009

very nice airplane good fly fast shippin

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Feb 25, 2009

As for this airframe, assembly is easily, and strongly made.

I think it is just good for the practice of the stunt.

I want power a little more as for the regrettable one.

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Feb 13, 2009

I am an aero engineer and here are my comments:

The cg is very back making it very unstable.

It needed a considerable down thrust.

The landing gear is soft and it needs support.

The following is well deployed by the other lads.:

The elevator and rudder need the minimum movements.

stavros kal