Fatshark Полноцветный 640х480 FPV Видео очки

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Certified Buyer Rated

Aug 31, 2012

The overall quality of the googles is rather satisfying. The picture is okay, there is a slightly noticeable blur at the edges but not so disturbing. The right IPD stick is stuck a bit and can not move the whole track, it is most possibly a QC issue. I am feeding it with 10.5V to avoid overheating. I am also using the diopter lens set, the only issue is that on the right side the lens touches the display optics very slightly. Wearing the googles is pleasant until now. If there were no quality issues I would give 5 stars, this way, just 4.5. Still, a recommended product but the price could be lower a bit.

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Certified Buyer Rated

Jul 28, 2012

Good goggles from Fatshark. Nothing is perfect. These are my first glasses. Good picture. When using slightly warm. Works well with 2S.

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Certified Buyer Rated

Jul 26, 2012

Very high quality product

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Jul 22, 2012

EASY GLIDER
FPV 900 MHZ 1,5 WATT
MOTOR 35-42 TURNIGY
ESC 70 AMP TURNIGY
COPILOTO FMA
EMISORA TURNIGY
MDULO CORONA
AMPLIFICADOR 2 WATT EMISORA
LIPO 3600 MAMP

http://youtu.be/muigVBojSZc

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Certified Buyer Rated

Jun 10, 2012

These are my first goggles in the FPV experience. And I did that choice because of these advantages:

- big FOV (deeper immersion)

- good blocking of external light

- adjustable IPD

- enough room for modding (you can even put video RX inside!)

- good price



Anyway, it's really worth to be the first FPV goggles :)

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Mar 22, 2012

At reading all the comments about these Fatshark googles , it 's like if HK had sent two qualities of stuff.

Some guys look very please with it . Some others complains hard from being burned ! Up to the point they seem to have given up any hope to get any thing for the money they paid , after month with no news . So , I hesitate to buy one FS by HK , because if the serial that come next is a bad one , it seems ther is no actual way to get a new one or money back. And 230 $ needs to think before throwing them in the garbage. Until now, I use the HK Tgy googles I bought here, and I can't complain : they are OK .

I buy lots of things in HK , and for a long time : I have no reasons to say I am not a satisfyed custumer .(except once in all my orders.. with don't matters )

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Mar 06, 2012

I got one pair also. They came covered with some glue like stuff that destroyed the gloss finish. The left lens is foggy and the right one has an occasional speck of something inside of it that seems to get fixed by shaking it. I tried to reason with HK support but they have their heads stuck inside their asses.

After a month of pointless conversations they offered 3$ for after that 10$ only if i would admit there was nothing wrong with them and in the end nothing.

I decided to talk to Gary @ Fatshark and seek for support because of so many stories of things sent back for warranty just to wait 3-4 months to actually have them fixed, unless they are lost forever.

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Feb 29, 2012

I have ordered a lot of RC things but! I thing this will top all of what I ordered if they work as expected and described! I have never used goggles so this will be fun! I hope? all looks good but I will find out when I put them to the test, for me this is a good set so I can use 5.8 or 1.3mhz I'm just a old Soldier we will see!

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Certified Buyer Rated

Feb 20, 2012

I got a pair of these and besides the fact that they had glue all over them (which destroyed the glossy finish) the left optical block is really fuzzy. They offered 3$ in bonus points to close the case...

• Overall
• Quality
• Value

Customer Rated

Feb 01, 2012

Not happy with mine, I havent used them outside yet but already I have a large mark inside on of the viewing screens Its not a scratch but something not right, I guess I get to have a crappy view with a big water mark